Low Traffic Hackney
  • Low Traffic Hackney
  • Our Manifesto 2026
  • Evidence
  • Hackney's LTNs
    • Hoxton East LTN
    • Dalston liveable neighbourhood
    • Hoxton West LTN
    • Chatsworth Road
    • London Fields LTN
    • Stoke Newington LTN
    • Hackney Downs LTN
    • Stamford Hill West LTN
  • Hackney's Main Roads
  • Join us
  • Latest News
  • Low Traffic Hackney
  • Our Manifesto 2026
  • Evidence
  • Hackney's LTNs
    • Hoxton East LTN
    • Dalston liveable neighbourhood
    • Hoxton West LTN
    • Chatsworth Road
    • London Fields LTN
    • Stoke Newington LTN
    • Hackney Downs LTN
    • Stamford Hill West LTN
  • Hackney's Main Roads
  • Join us
  • Latest News
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

Latest News from around Hackney

9/2/2026

Dalston Liveable Neighbourhood plans revealed

Finally, at last, the plans for the much debated and longed-for Dalston Liveable Neighourhood have been revealed. It was 3 years ago in January 2023 that Mete Coban, the then Cabinet member for Transport, promised that Dalston would be getting an LTN. Local residents have been campaigning for it to be built since then, some feeling increasingly frustrated at what they see as missed deadlines. Then last year in 2025 there was a full consultation asking for input from people who live in the area, or visit, or pass through. Unsurprisingly, car owners were over represented in this consultation, but young people were under represented.

For clarity, the area in question is bounded by the A10, Dalston Lane and Amhurst Road. Looking at other LTNs in Hackney, its clear that this area outlined in blue below is one of the few areas not yet benefitting from traffic reduction measures:
As a result, Dalston suffers from high levels of traffic, including through traffic using local roads as rat-runs or short cuts. In particular, this impacts roads including Shacklewell Lane (over 10,000 vehicles per day), St Mark's Rise (11,000 vehicles per day), Cecilia Road and Sandringham Road (both 5000 per day), and the five schools in the area.
​
Road danger
Local residents frequently complain that crossing roads and cycling is very dangerous, and there have been many near misses and road collisions often caused by drivers ignoring the 20mph speed limit or driving recklessly. Sandringham Road is the most dangerous, based on the number of accidents, followed by Cecilia Road and Shacklewell Lane. Data from TfL Collisions Map.

3/4 of Dalston residents don't have a car
It's important to understand that Dalston has very low levels of car ownership, even compared to other areas of Hackney. According to the ONS, 73% of households in the area have no access to a vehicle. Only 24% of household have a single car or van. So, to be clear, about three quarters of households in the area have no car or van.

​What's the plan?
At the heart of the plan is the bus gate on Shacklewell Lane, but this is a big scheme:
  • Bus gate on Shacklewell Lane at the junction with Amhurst Road
  • Foulden Road, Farleigh Road and Arcola Street will be closed to through traffic, except cycles and emergency vehicles
  • Many banned turns including Ridley Road to Dalston Lane, and Dalston Lane to Cecilia Road
  • Banned left turn out of Birbeck Road into Sandringham Road (camera enforced)
  • Diagonal filters (bollards or planters) on Downs Park Road, Sandringham Road and Montague Road
  • Three School Streets (where roads are closed to traffic at times when students are arriving and leaving school) for Halley House School and Excelsior Academy
  • Raised tables on Shacklewell Lane, Arcola Street, Downs Park Road and Sandringham Road​
Picture
Benefits
We think this scheme will have a really significant impact on ​reducing traffic in Dalston, especially reducing through-traffic. It will also improve air quality, make walking and cycling safer, reduce noise pollution from traffic, give children more freedom to travel independently, and improve the overall experience of living or visiting the area. For these reasons, we fully support the Dalston liveable neighbourhood scheme and applaud the council for the ambition here.

Phased approach
Our main concern is that the council have opted for a phased approach to implementation, as you can see here:
We would prefer to see full implementation in one go rather than a phased approach, which runs the risk of confusing people and encouraging drivers to complain over a longer period of time. Not implementing the bus gate on Shacklewell Lane until phase 3 in 2027 is a risky approach given how central it is to the entire scheme.

​Give it time
We know that LTNs take time to settle in once implemented, and that will take longer with the proposed phased approach. In the past, residents who are initially 
unhappy often end up being in favour of schemes like this, once they've got used to it and see the benefits.

The council's impact assessment suggests that around 18,000 people might benefit from the scheme but 400 people will have a dis-benefit from regular longer car journeys. We think this is definitely a price worth paying.

The council decision date is Friday 13th February, after which work to implement the first phase can begin.

Show your support!
You can show your support for the scheme by emailing the following (this really does help):

Hackney Mayor Caroline Woodley [email protected]
Councillor Richard Lufkin [email protected]
Cabinet member for Transport Sarah Young [email protected]
Dalston Councillor [email protected]
Group Engineer and report author Maryann Allen [email protected]
Councillor Gilbert Smyth [email protected]
Cabinet member for Health Chris Kennedy [email protected]

Assistant Director Streetscene Tyler Linton [email protected]​

If you want to email them all together, simply copy this list of addresses into the TO line in your email:
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]​

The full 93 page Key Decision document can be accessed here:
https://hackney.moderngov.co.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=343&MId=6358



Catherine Bradshaw
18/2/2026 00:44:46

I’m totally against this - have to travel for work in my car across multiple locations in and out of London with equipment that I could not take on the bus. I also feel very unsafe walking alone as a women through any LTN. I have missed vital appointments because of traffic on the boundary roads that’s was never there before ( I’ve lived in N16 for 30 years), I have had taxis refusing me because of LTNs, electro and, plumbers and builders refusing me because of them. Street crime in the area is high and I don’t feel safe walking. Open the roads- you are imposing all this in a very I democratic way and I do not agree with the closure of our ( not your) roads

Low Traffic Hackney
20/2/2026 14:25:51

@catherine. Thanks for your comment. The evidence clearly suggests that personal safety actually improves in LTNs. Please see our Evidence page for more on this: https://www.lowtraffichackney.org/evidence.html (the link is in the main navigation on this site).

The truth is that traffic in Hackney has been very bad for decades, simply because we are an inner London borough with almost half of traffic being "through traffic which starts and ends outside of Hackney, and additionally there are too many short trips in cars which could be taken in other ways (walking, bus, bike). Not saying all trips could be made by walking, biking or by bus, but a high proportion of them could be. For example, driving a short distance to take children to school, which causes big peaks in rush hour traffic. Since 2022 the number of miles driven in Hackney has actually increased, which is why we need more measures to reduce miles driven, to make it quicker to travel by bus, and safer to cycle and walk.

Lastly, they are all our roads. We are local residents (not the council) who want less (not more) traffic on both side roads and main roads. Please do have a read of our Evidence page!

Stephen Driscoll link
21/2/2026 15:38:48

the comment attributed to my name if fake. I did not write that comment and did not make any comment on that date.

Stephen Driscoll
18/2/2026 14:24:07

Absolute nonsense. No one wants this ltn!

Low Traffic Hackney
20/2/2026 14:14:48

@stephen, clearly that is not true! See the consultation report which has data to show that people do want it!
https://consultation.hackney.gov.uk/streetscene/dalston-liveable-neighbourhood/user_uploads/report---dalston-liveable-neighbourhood---sept-24.pdf

Frances
20/2/2026 14:06:25

Thanks to the LTNs I can cycle with my sons to their school and then onto work for 9am - I really appreciate them as we have no car so not sure how we would do this on time if they were not here! I still worry about safety but much less in LTNs where drivers seem aware of us and five more carefully mostly (and there are fewer cars).

Chris
20/2/2026 14:29:32

Dalston has been a nightmare for ages with so many speeding cars, parking on double yellow lines, engine idling. Cycling around Dalston is pretty scary due to the number of drivers who speed and take risks.

Its about time Dalston residents (most of whom don't drive regularly) were given a safer, less polluted and quieter neighbourhood. This Dalston scheme looks very sensible to me


Comments are closed.

Join us to help make a greener and more pleasant Hackney! 


Social:

Low Traffic Hackney on:
  • Bluesky
  • Instagram
  • ​Facebook
  • Linked In

​

Complete Hackney Council consultations:
​

Consultations Hub


 Email:

[email protected]